Examino - AI Essay Grader for Fast & Accurate Paper Evaluation

What

Examino is an AI grading application for teachers that scans and evaluates student papers, including handwritten work, and returns grades and feedback in seconds. It is designed to reduce manual grading time while supporting more consistent evaluation across essays, calculations, diagrams, graphs, and other common assessment formats.

The product appears positioned as a classroom assessment tool for educators across primary through higher education and across many subjects. Its core workflow is: import the assessment, capture or upload student papers, review the AI-detected scoring system and expected answers, then run grading and review class-level results.

Features

• Handwritten paper capture: Teachers can scan papers with a smartphone, making it possible to process handwritten responses without requiring students to submit typed work.
• AI-assisted pre-grading: The system analyzes answers and proposes grades and feedback based on the teacher’s scoring criteria, which helps reduce repetitive marking effort.
• Assessment structure detection: Examino detects and pre-fills expected answers and scoring elements from the assessment document, which can speed setup before grading begins.
• Multi-format response evaluation: It can process written text, mathematical calculations, diagrams, graphs, and geometric drawings, which makes it suitable for mixed-format exams.
• Class performance tracking: Teachers receive detailed grades and a broader view of class results, helping them identify areas where instruction may need adjustment.
• Broad subject and class coverage: The product states support for more than 25 disciplines, 15 grade levels, and unlimited classes and subjects per account.

Helpful Tips

• Validate the rubric carefully: Since the workflow depends on AI-detected scoring and expected answers, teachers should review these inputs closely before launching grading.
• Use it first on repeatable assessments: Standardized quizzes, written assignments, and structured exams are likely the easiest places to evaluate grading consistency and fit.
• Check edge cases in complex subjects: For disciplines involving nuanced argumentation, partial-credit math, or unusual diagrams, a human review step remains important.
• Plan around export needs: The page mentions exporting grades to educational tools, but it does not specify which systems are supported, so compatibility should be confirmed early.
• Pilot by subject and grade band: Because the platform spans many disciplines and education levels, adoption may work best when introduced gradually with clear teacher review practices.